|
Complexity
|
Useful
|
Bias
|
Source
|
| Reading
level/Vocabulary/Navigatonal Features |
Does the source answer your question? |
Is the information fact or fiction? Is it
slanted towards the author's opinion? |
Credentials, expertise, knowledge
|
|
1
|
- Too difficult or too basic to be of value
- Design is cumbersome--difficult to find information
|
- Doesn't address the question
|
- Incorrect information
- Information provided only shows one side
|
- Author unlisted/personal website (geocities)
- Mistakes in grammar, spelling
|
|
2
|
- Reading level isn't perfect, but somewhat useable OR
- Navigational features are difficult but not a barrier
|
- Partially answers the question
|
- Viewpoint is obvious but information is accessible for
other viewpoints
- Information given is accurate, but incomplete
|
- Some reference to expertise
|
|
3
|
- Vocabulary & sentence structure match reading
ability
- Design features help to locate information
|
- Perfectly matches the question
|
- Complete, accurate information
- All points of view represented
|
- Affiliation with reputable organization
- Expertise clearly shown
- Copyright information provided
|